Friday, April 25, 2014

Virginia Traffic Lawyers Reckless Driving Lynchburg Violation

8:48 PM | Posted by Unknown | Edit Post
Lawyer - Virginia Reckless Driving

As per Va. Code § 46.2-852, the general rule for reckless driving is defined as, irrespective of the maximum speeds permitted by law, any person who drives a vehicle on any highway recklessly or at a speed or in a manner so as to endanger the life, limb, or property of any person shall be guilty of reckless driving.

Below is a sample case of reckless driving in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with Reckless Driving in Virginia and you are wondering what the penalty is in VA? 

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with Reckless Driving in Virginia?

For a lot of our clients, a charge of Reckless Driving can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance, etc.

Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with a crime of Reckless Driving in Virginia.

If you have been charged with a criminal offense of Reckless Driving in Virginia and you are wondering what the penalty is in VA, contact our law firm for help. 

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Contact our law firm today to speak with a lawyer today about your Criminal Case.  An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. The lawyers in our law firm have the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Harry v. Commonwealth

Facts:

After two police officers put a be-on-the-lookout bulletin on the radio for a vehicle that had been driving recklessly in Lynchburg, a detective stopped the vehicle a short distance away. The detective removed defendant from the vehicle and patted him down for weapons. The detective felt a bulge in defendant's sock that he believed to be some type of weapon. The bulge was a glassine tube containing cocaine. The trial judge found that the officer stopped defendant based on a report of reckless driving and conducted the pat down for safety reasons.

If you are facing a traffic case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:

  • Ruling that an officer's authority to require a driver to exit a vehicle following a lawful stop for a traffic violation is an additional intrusion that can only be described as de minimus, the United States Supreme Court implicitly rejects the notion of requiring the "least intrusive investigation." 
  • The authorization for a frisk for weapons arises from the holding in Terry that a police officer is permitted to frisk a suspect's outer clothing if the officer can point to specific and articulable facts that, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably lead the officer to conclude that criminal activity may be afoot and that the suspect may be armed and presently dangerous.
  • Even in high crime areas, where the possibility that any given individual is armed is significant, Terry requires reasonable, individualized suspicion before a frisk for weapons can be conducted.
We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

An attorney from our firm will do his best to help you.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case. The lawyers in our law firm have the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group.  They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions.  The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.
Labels:

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Social Icons

Powered by Blogger.

Designed by Sris Law Group.